Trends in Minimally Invasive Orthopedic Surgery

Authors

  • Mian Iftikhar ul Haq Department of Neurosurgery, Hayatabad Medical Complex Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71465/jhmri82

Keywords:

Minimally Invasive Surgery, Arthroscopy, Orthopedic Innovation, Robotic Surgery, Endoscopy

Abstract

Minimally invasive orthopedic surgery (MIOS) has revolutionized musculoskeletal care by offering less traumatic alternatives to traditional open procedures. Driven by advancements in imaging, instrumentation, robotics, and surgical technique, MIOS is associated with reduced pain, faster recovery, and improved functional outcomes. This article reviews the current trends, innovations, clinical outcomes, and challenges in MIOS across various orthopedic subspecialties, and explores future directions in this rapidly evolving field.

References

Matsuda, D. K., et al. (2020). Current concepts in hip arthroscopy: Advances in minimally invasive hip preservation. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 28(1), 40–49.

Kalogera, E., et al. (2014). Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: is minimally invasive still minimally invasive? Annals of Surgical Oncology, 21(4), 1299–1307.

Goyal, N., et al. (2017). Outcomes of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional technique. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 32(9), 2843–2848.

Rasouli, M. R., et al. (2013). Reduction in hospitalization costs associated with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics, 36(1), e1–e7.

Kim, C. W., & Sciubba, D. M. (2018). Minimally invasive spine surgery: current approach and future directions. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 28(3), 256–265.

Dyrna, F., et al. (2016). Evolution and current trends in minimally invasive trauma surgery. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 42(2), 161–168.

Lonner, J. H., et al. (2016). Robotics in orthopedic surgery. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 24(11), 754–762.

Degen, R. M., et al. (2018). The role of orthobiologics in hip preservation surgery. The Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery, 5(3), 180–194.

Huang, T. J., et al. (2021). Augmented reality in minimally invasive spine surgery. Spine Journal, 21(2), 256–263.

Goyal, K. S., et al. (2015). The benefits of outpatient minimally invasive orthopedic surgery: A review. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 46(4), 489–500.

Carr, A. J., et al. (2012). Knee replacement. Lancet, 379(9823), 1331–1340.

Goh, G. S. H., et al. (2020). Robotics in total hip arthroplasty: current status and future perspectives. Arthroplasty Today, 6(1), 51–56.

Jones, C. A., et al. (2016). Enhanced recovery pathways and minimally invasive surgery. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 122(3), 771–778.

Kim, J. H., et al. (2015). Learning curve and complications of MIS techniques. Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 7(3), 298–303.

Siemionow, K., et al. (2015). Outcomes of minimally invasive vs traditional posterior spinal fusions. Spine, 40(8), E409–E415.

Phillips, B. B., et al. (2022). Integration of AI into orthopedic surgical navigation. Orthopedic Clinics, 53(1), 17–28.

Howard, J. L., et al. (2017). Personalized implants and instrumentation in orthopedic surgery. Orthopedic Research and Reviews, 9, 65–72.

Higgins, B. T., et al. (2016). Robotic-assisted vs conventional THA: a matched-pair analysis. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 10(3), 163–168.

Spalding, T. J., et al. (2021). Advances in knee arthroscopy. British Medical Bulletin, 139(1), 64–75.

Giordano, B. D., et al. (2019). Future technologies in orthopedic surgery. Orthopedic Research and Reviews, 11, 133–142.

Ahmad, N. R. (2026). AI-enabled public governance in developing states: Service delivery gains, accountability risks, and a practical risk-based regulatory model. https://doi.org/10.52152/wja5db40

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31